About the Author(s)

Karin Alvåsen Email symbol
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Sandra M. Johansson
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden

Johan Höglund symbol
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Sweden

Richard Ssuna
Lilongwe Society for Protection and Care of Animals, Lilongwe, Malawi

Ulf Emanuelson symbol
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden


Alvåsen, K., Johansson, S.M., Höglund, J., Ssuna, R. & Emanuelson, U., 2016, ‘A field survey on parasites and antibodies against selected pathogens in owned dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 87(1), a1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v87i1.1358

Original Research

A field survey on parasites and antibodies against selected pathogens in owned dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi

Karin Alvåsen, Sandra M. Johansson, Johan Höglund, Richard Ssuna, Ulf Emanuelson

Received: 26 Nov. 2015; Accepted: 03 May 2016; Published: 29 July 2016

Copyright: © 2016. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The aim of this study was to screen for selected parasites and antibody levels against vector-borne pathogens in owned dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi. The study population consisted of 100 dogs; 80 participating in vaccination–spaying campaigns and 20 visiting a veterinary clinic as paying clients. All dogs went through a general physical examination including visual examination for signs of ectoparasites. A total of 100 blood samples were analysed using commercial snap tests and 40 faecal samples by egg flotation in saturated sodium chloride. The sampled dogs had a seroprevalence of 12% for Anaplasma spp., 22% for Ehrlichia spp., 4% for Dirofilaria immitis and 1% for Leishmania spp. Eggs from Ancylostoma spp. were found in 80% of the faecal samples, whereas eggs of Trichuris vulpis, Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina were only present in 3%, 8% and 13% of the samples, respectively. Ectoparasites such as Ctenocephalides sp., Trichodectes sp. and ticks were present on 98%, 25% and 11%, respectively, of the campaign dogs. Among client dogs, 35% had Ctenocephalides fleas, 10% had Trichodectes lice and none had ticks. Public education and prophylactic treatment could be used to improve the animal welfare of dogs; this would most likely also have positive impact on public health.


According to the concept of ‘One Health’, improvement of animal health contributes to the health of humans. Diseases in the animal population may constitute a threat to public health (Lavallén et al. 2011; Matjila et al. 2008; Schurer et al. 2013), especially in low income countries (Bwalya et al. 2011; Esemu, Ndip & Ndip 2011; Sowemimo & Asaolu 2008) such as Malawi.

In Lilongwe, the capital of Malawi, the human population reached 905 000 in 2015 (CIA 2015) and the dog population was approximately 100 000 (of which 36 500 were strays) in 2013 (Boone 2013). The dog is a domestic animal that lives in close contact with humans and other animals. Despite their beneficial effects, dogs are associated with many zoonotic diseases and pose public health concerns worldwide (Millán et al. 2013; Reaser, Clark & Meyers 2008; Slater 2001; Yabsley et al. 2008). To prevent the spread of animal diseases and zoonotic pathogens, it is necessary to establish which pathogens are present (Irwin 2014; Noden & Soni 2015).

With the exception of rabies, there is a dearth of information on the epidemiology of canine pathogens in Malawi. To our knowledge, there is only one study (Fitzsimmons 1967) on parasites and other microbes within the dog population in southern Malawi. The objective of the present field study was to screen for the presence of selected parasites and antibody levels against selected vector-borne pathogens in the dog population in Lilongwe, Malawi.


Study site and selection of dogs

This study was carried out in the urban and peri-urban areas of Lilongwe, Malawi, during September and October 2014. It was performed in accordance with local guidelines for non-experimental research of the Lilongwe Society for Protection and Care of Animals (LSPCA) and Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). Owned dogs participating in rabies vaccination and spaying campaigns and dogs visiting a veterinary clinic were eligible for inclusion, and ethical approval for such non-experimental research was not needed. The vaccination-spaying campaigns and the veterinary clinic are both run by LSPCA. The rabies vaccination campaign is conducted for 2 weeks every autumn, and in 2014 it included approximately 16 000 dogs. The spaying campaign runs all-year round, twice-weekly. The dogs participating in campaigns were either free-roaming or kept confined outdoors. Areas included in this study were initially selected randomly. Later specific areas were targeted to ensure that free-roaming and confined dogs were equally represented. A total of 80 campaign dogs (40 free-roaming and 40 confined) were included in the study. In addition, 20 dogs visiting the LSPCA clinic as paying clients (hereafter referred to as client dogs) were included. Client dogs came from the urban areas and were generally kept indoors and/or fenced-in. Participating dogs were brought to either the campaign or to the clinic by the owner. The owner was informed about the purpose of the present study and gave permission to collect and use samples.


Dog owners filled out a questionnaire in either English or the local language Chichewa. The questionnaire covered aspects such as the dog’s age, how it was kept, veterinary visits, vaccinations and use of endo- and/or ectoparasiticides.

Sample collection

All dogs enrolled went through a physical examination, which included evaluation of their weight, mucosal inspection and palpation of the lymph nodes. Blood (~5 mL) from the vena cephalica was added to Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) vacutainer tubes. Blood was either immediately transferred to a snap test or transported in a freezer box with a cool pack to the laboratory of LSPCA to be analysed within 24 h.

Faecal samples were collected from the rectum of half of the campaign dogs (40 out of 80). It was not possible to sample all dogs as some were stressed or did not have enough faeces at the time of sampling. Faeces were collected both from dogs being awake and from dogs under anaesthesia. Oil was used as a lubricant when needed. Nitrile gloves were used during the collection, and the faeces was put in a 10-mL plastic transport tube, transported in a freezer box with a cool pack, for analysis at the laboratory of LSPCA within 24 h.

Sample analysis
Visual analysis

The coat of the dogs was visually examined for presence and signs of ectoparasites. Special attention was given to the ears since these are one of the predilection sites for ticks (Jacobs et al. 2001).

Faecal analysis

Faecal analysis for presence of helminth eggs was done by egg flotation. Fresh faeces (~5 mL) were placed in a 10-mL transport tube before adding tap water until the tube was almost full. The contents were mixed to a homogenous solution that was sieved through a 150 µm mesh into a centrifuge tube and centrifuged (for 10 min at 1286 g). The supernatant was discarded and the faecal pellet resuspended in 5 mL saturated NaCl, mixed, and then topped up with an additional 5 mL. Eggs were collected by floating a coverslip on the surface of the resuspended pellet for at least 15 min. The coverslip was thereafter transferred to a glass slide and examined microscopically at 100× and 400× magnification. Eggs were identified by using their morphological characteristics (Taylor, Coop & Wall 2007); dogs were classified as parasite positive when a helminth egg was observed.

Serological analysis

The blood was analysed for circulating antibodies against Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia spp. and Leishmania spp. Two commercial ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) tests were used: Idexx SNAP® 4Dx® Plus (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, United States) and BVT Speed Leish K (BVT, La Seyne sur Mer, France).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences between dog populations regarding prevalence of selected parasites and antibodies. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A binominal exact confidence interval with a 95% confidence level was calculated for the prevalences using the Clopper-Pearson (exact) method (Danielsoper 2015).



The campaign dogs were 0.5–13 years old with an average age of 3.8 years (median 3.0 years). The client dogs were between 0.6 and 13 years old with an average age of 4.1 years (median 3.5 years).

Forty-one percent (33 out of 80) of the campaign dogs and 85% (17 out of 20) of the client dogs had visited a veterinarian at least once. Of the campaign dogs, 70% (56 out of 80) had been vaccinated against rabies and one of these dogs had also been vaccinated against parvo virus. Of the client dogs, 95% (19 out of 20) had been vaccinated against rabies and 80% (16 out of 20) against parvo virus. Of the campaign dogs 31% (25 out of 80) had been dewormed at some point, while 80% (16 out of 20) of the client dogs were dewormed regularly.

Of the campaign dogs, 55% (44 out of 80) received ectoparasiticides once every 1–3 months. Some communities dipped all the village dogs in amitraz every 1–2 months. Eighteen client dog owners (90%) reported that they treated their dogs against ectoparasites monthly, usually with an antiparasitic shampoo containing pyrethrin, and one owner used spot on products (fipronil). Tick collars or other substances against ectoparasites were not used.

Physical examination
General health status

Most dogs were in good body condition, but 35% of client dogs were moderately overweight and 15% of campaign dogs were underweight. Two dogs (one confined campaign dog and one client dog) had clinical signs of anaemia.


Visual examination of the dogs’ coats showed a high prevalence of Ctenocephalides sp. (Table 1), but species was not defined. The prevalence of Ctenocephalides fleas was significantly higher among campaign dogs than in client dogs, but there was no difference between the two campaign groups (free-roaming vs. confined). Many dogs had wounds on their scalps and outer ears, likely because of fly bites. Ticks were only found on campaign dogs. Of the nine campaign dogs with ticks, eight were free-roaming of which seven were also positive for antibodies against Ehrlichia spp. There was no statistically significant difference between campaign and client dogs concerning prevalence of lice and ticks (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Prevalence (with confidence intervals) of ectoparasites in dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi, September–October 2014.

Hookworm eggs (Ancylostoma sp.) were present in 80% (32 out of 40) of the faecal samples (Table 2). Eggs of other genera sporadically identified were Trichuris, Toxocara and Toxascaris.

TABLE 2: Prevalence (with confidence intervals) of endoparasites in faeces from 40 campaign dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi, September–October 2014.

Twelve dogs were seropositive for Anaplasma spp. (Table 3) and four of these dogs also had ticks. There was no statistically significant difference in seroprevalence between free-roaming and confined campaign dogs, or between campaign and client dogs.

TABLE 3: Prevalence (with confidence intervals) of serum antibodies against infectious agents in dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi, September–October 2014.

One dog had antibodies against Leishmania spp. This dog was 1 year old, free-roaming and participated in the rabies vaccination campaign. Four dogs were seropositive for D. immitis. These four dogs were free-roaming and participated in the campaigns. Two of them were elderly (8–10 years old), one was middle-aged (exact age unknown) and one was 9 months old. No dog was seropositive for B. burgdorferi.

Antibodies against Ehrlichia spp. were found in 22% (22 out of 100) of the dogs (Table 3). There was no statistically significant difference in prevalence between campaign and client dogs. The only client dog seropositive for Ehrlichia spp. was free-roaming. The prevalence among the free-roaming campaign dogs was significantly higher than in the confined campaign dogs. Ticks were identified on 7 of the 21 campaign dogs that were seropositive for Ehrlichia spp.


General health

The brief general examination found that 85% of the campaign dogs were in good condition and 15% were underweight. The latter could be a consequence of underfeeding but could also indicate chronic disease. Furthermore, free-roaming dogs in poor condition were probably less likely to be vaccinated or spayed and the general health status in this population could therefore have been overestimated. The average age was low (about 4 years) indicating a high turnover rate or that Lilongwe dogs are neutered at a young age.

Parasites and antibodies against vector-borne pathogens

Ectoparasites were common with fleas being present on the majority of dogs. This result was expected as a high prevalence of fleas in dogs is common in several developing countries in the tropics (Colombo et al. 2011; Kumsa & Mekonnen 2011; Wells et al. 2012). The high density of free-roaming dogs provides ample opportunity for the transmission of ectoparasites and is possibly an explanation for the high prevalence found. Ectoparasiticides were infrequently used. Fleas were common in areas where dogs were dipped regularly, as amitraz is not effective on fleas (Folz et al. 1986). The low number of dogs infected with lice might be because lice are more difficult to detect by visual examination. The true prevalence of lice was most likely higher. The prevalence of dogs with ticks was also low in the present study. However, as antibodies to tick-borne pathogens Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. were abundant in the study population, with Ehrlichia spp. in higher numbers, the prevalence of tick infestations could also have been underestimated. During a more thorough examination of 10 dogs that were under anaesthesia, but not part of the study, ticks were found in the ears of all dogs, further strengthening this hypothesis. The significant difference in prevalence of ticks between campaign and client dogs is probably because client dogs were treated more regularly against ectoparasites. Client dogs were also usually confined, which reduced the exposure to infested dogs and risk environments.

The heartworm D. immitis frequently occurs in tropical countries where the mosquito vectors are present throughout the year (Davoust et al. 2008). In the present study, only 4% of the dogs were seropositive for D. immitis. The low prevalence may be because of the young age of the study population, as the prevalence has been shown to increase with age (Vezzani et al. 2011), but may equally be because of absence of suitable vectors in the study area. None of the client dogs had antibodies against heartworm. Although there was no statistically significant difference in prevalence between the campaign and client populations, the risk of mosquito bites is likely to be reduced when dogs are kept indoors. A larger number of client dogs would be needed to confirm this interpretation.

Twelve percent of the dogs that were seropositive for Anaplasma spp. Anaplasma phagocytophilum, a species closely related to Anaplasma platys, have been documented in Africa and are all known to cross react with the ELISA test used. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be necessary to identify Anaplasma species present in Malawi. No dog in the present survey was seropositive for B. burgdorferi, and this result was expected as B. burgdorferi has not yet been detected in Southern Africa (Gern & Falco 2000).

Over one-fifth (22%) of the dogs in the present survey were seropositive to Ehrlichia spp. antibodies. This seroprevalence is much lower than those detected in Tunisia, Mexico and Kenya, 54% (155 out of 286), 44% (53 out of 120) and 86% (56 out of 65), respectively (M’Ghirbi et al. 2009; Rodriguez-Vivas, Albornoz & Bolio 2005; Woodroffe et al. 2012). The seroprevalence among the free-roaming dogs (38%) in the present survey was however higher than that reported in rural dogs in Uganda (30%; Proboste et al. 2015) or in dogs in Maasai Mara, Kenya (16%; Alexander et al. 1993).

It is noteworthy that only one dog in this study was seropositive for Leishmania spp. This seropositive dog might be a false positive because Leishmania spp. are rarely seen in Malawi (WHO 2012). Thus, the prevalence of this zoonotic parasite seems to be low in owned dogs in the studied areas of Lilongwe, which is an important finding from a medical perspective (Ashford 2000; Greene 2006).

Most faecal samples (80%) contained eggs of the tropical hookworm Ancylostoma spp. This result is similar to the 88% reported from the Southern Province of Malawi (Fitzsimmons 1967), 79% reported from pet and stray dogs in northwest Ethiopia (Abere, Bogale & Melaku 2013) and 72% reported from Zambia (Bwalya et al. 2011), but higher than the 35% reported in Gabon (Davoust et al. 2008). These differences in prevalence may reflect differences in climate, sampling, veterinary facilities and public awareness (Abere et al. 2013). Malawi has a tropical climate, which allows this parasite to survive in soil for several weeks (Gasser, Cantavessi & Loukas 2008). Ancylostoma spp. may be transmitted from the environment by direct ingestion of larva as well as transcutaneously (Traub et al. 2014). Direct transmission from dam to pups may occur transplacentally or via her milk amplifying the parasite burden in the population (Bowman et al. 2010; Swai et al. 2010). The climate, the variety of transmission routes available to this parasite, the large population of stray dogs that are never dewormed and the absence of social pressure that convinces dog owners to pick up their dogs’ faeces facilitate a high environmental contamination with hookworm larvae.

In this survey, two species of ascarids, Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonine, were found in 8% (3 out of 40) and 13% (5 out of 40) of the dogs. The prevalence of T. leonina in dogs is normally higher in older dogs than in puppies (Minnaar, Krecek & Fourie 2002), and the results from the present field study are in agreement with figures from South Africa (Minnaar & Krecek 2001). The proportion of dogs infested with T. canis in this study is lower than the reported prevalence of T. canis in Ethiopia (40%), and Gabon (58.5%; Abere et al. 2013; Davoust et al. 2008). In contrast, Fitzsimmons (1967) reported a total absence of ascarid worms in 120 euthanised Malawian dogs. As T. canis migrate to the mammary glands in adult dogs (Overgaauw & Van Knapen 2013; Rubinsky-Elefant et al. 2010), the true prevalence of Toxocara-infected dogs in Lilongwe was most likely underestimated. Puppies, which are the main egg shedders (Minnaar, Krecek & Rajput 1999), were not included in the present study. Dogs under 6 months of age were however included in the Ethiopian study (Abere et al. 2013), which partly explains the difference in prevalence between the two studies. A low number of dogs can pass a large number of eggs in their faeces, and T. canis eggs can survive in the environment for several years (Overgaauw & van Knapen 2013).

All three of the above worms may be zoonotic. Infection may occur by direct ingestion of eggs or larvae of all three species through direct or indirect contact (e.g. on dog’s coat or contaminated soil) with infected faeces. Cutaneous larval migrans may develop when Ancylostoma larva penetrate the skin (Bowman et al. 2010). Visceral larva migrans may develop after ingestion of Toxocara eggs (Amaral et al. 2010). This is much more common with Toxocara canis but has rarely been reported with Toxocara leonina. Children are at highest risk for exposure as they frequently handle puppies, play in the dirt and generally have lower hygiene standards than adults (Rubinsky-Elefant et al. 2010).


The owned dog population in Lilongwe, Malawi, was exposed to pathogens that can cause diseases and poor welfare. This also poses health risks for humans. The relatively high prevalence of parasites and vector-borne pathogens, combined with the high number of dogs in Lilongwe, makes the disease pressure considerable. Introducing measures to control these pathogens would not only improve animal welfare but also contribute to improved public health, and they therefore merit serious consideration.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff at LSPCA for their help with sample collection and with translations. The authors thank Anna Gyllenhammar and Lisa Persson (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences [SLU]) for their support. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improving the article. The study was performed as a minor field study with funding from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and SLU.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

K.A., S.M.J. and U.E. made substantial contributions to the conception of the work. S.M.J. performed most of the data collection, laboratory and data analyses, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of results and revised the work. K.A. compiled the final version of the manuscript. U.E. was the project leader. All authors approved the final version of the article and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Abere, T., Bogale, B. & Melaku, A., 2013, ‘Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pet and stray dogs as a potential risk for human health in Bahir Dar town, north-western Ethiopia’, Veterinary World 6, 388–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.388-392

Alexander, K.A., Conrad, P.A., Gardner, I.A., Parish, C., Appel, M., Levy, M.G., et al., 1993, ‘Serologic survey for selected microbial pathogens in African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus) and sympatric domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) in Maasai Mara, Kenya’, Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24, 140–144.

Amaral, H.L.C., Rassier, G.L., Soares Pepe, M., Gallina, T., Villela, M.M., Nobre, M.O. et al., 2010, ’Presence of Toxocara canis eggs on hair of dogs: A risk factor for Visceral Larva Migrans’, Veterinary Parasitology 174, 115–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.07.016

Ashford, R., 2000, ‘The leishmaniases as emerging and reemerging zoonoses’, International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1269–1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00136-3

Boone, J.D., 2013, Baseline survey for street dogs in Lilongwe, Malawi, Humane Society International.

Bowman, D.D., Montgomery, S.P., Zajac, A.M., Eberhard, M.L. & Kazacos, K.R., 2010, ‘Hookworms of dogs and cats as agents of cutaneous larva migrans’, Trends in Parasitology 26, 162–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2010.01.005

Bwalya, E.C., Nalubamba, K.S., Hankanga, C. & Namangala, B., 2011, ‘Prevalence of canine gastrointestinal helminths in urban Lusaka and rural Katete Districts of Zambia’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 100, 252–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.015

CIA, 2015, World fact book: Africa Malawi, viewed 28 October 2015, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mi.html

Colombo, F.A., Odorizzi, R.M.F.N., Laurenti, M.D., Galati, E.B., Canavez, F. & Pereira-Chioccola, V.L., 2011, ‘Detection of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum RNA in fleas and ticks collected from naturally infected dogs’, Parasitology Research 109, 267–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2247-6

Danielsoper, 2015, ‘Confidence intervals’, viewed 20 November 2014, from http://www.danielsoper.com

Davoust, B., Normand, T., Bourry, O., Dang, H., Leroy, E. & Bourdoiseau, G., 2008, ‘Epidemiological survey on gastro-intestinal and blood-borne helminths of dogs in north-east Gabon’, The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 75, 359–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v75i4.112

Esemu, S.N., Ndip, L.M. & Ndip, R.N., 2011, ‘Ehrlichia species, probable emerging human pathogens in sub-Saharan Africa: Environmental exacerbation’, Reviews on Environmental Health 26, 269–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.2011.034

Fitzsimmons, W.M., 1967, ‘A survey of the parasites of native dogs in Southern Malawi with remarks on their medical and veterinary importance’, Journal of Helminthology 41, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X00021325

Folz, S.D., Ash, K.A., Conder, G.A. & Rector, D.L., 1986, ‘Amitraz: A tick and flea repellent and tick detachment drug’, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 9, 150–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1986.tb00024.x

Gasser, R.B., Cantacessi, C. & Loukas, A., 2008, ‘DNA technological progress toward advanced diagnostic tools to support human hookworm control’, Biotechnology Advances 26, 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.09.003

Gern, L. & Falco, R.C., 2000, ‘Lyme disease’, Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties 19, 121–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.1.1205

Greene, C., 2006, Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd edn., Saunders Elsivier, London.

Irwin, P.J., 2014, ‘It shouldn’t happen to a dog … or a veterinarian: Clinical paradigms for canine vector-borne diseases’, Trends in Parasitology 30, 104–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2013.12.001

Jacobs, P.A.H., Fourie, L.J., Kok, D.J. & Horak, I.G., 2001, ‘Diversity, seasonality and sites of attachment of adult ixodid ticks on dogs in the central region of the Free State Province, South Africa’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 281–290.

Kumsa, B.E. & Mekonnen, S., 2011, ‘Ixodid ticks, fleas and lice infesting dogs and cats in Hawassa, southern Ethiopia’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 78, 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v78i1.326

Lavallén, C.M., Dopchiz, M.C., Lobianco, E., Hollmann, P. & Denegri, G., 2011, ‘Intestinal parasites of zoonotic importance in dogs from the District of General Pueyrredón (Buenos Aires, Argentina)’, Revista Veterinaria 22, 19–24.

Matjila, P.T., Leisewitz, A.L., Jongejan, F. & Penzhorn, B.L., 2008, ‘Molecular detection of tick-borne protozoal and ehrlichial infections in domestic dogs in South Africa’, Veterinary Parasitology 155, 152–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.012

M’Ghirbi, Y., Ghorbel, A., Amouri, M., Nebaoui, A., Haddad, S. & Bouattour, A., 2009, ‘Clinical, serological, and molecular evidence of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs in Tunisia’, Parasitology Research 104, 767–774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1253-4

Millán, J., Chirife, A.D., Kalema-Zikusoka, G., Cabezón, O., Muro, J., Marco, I. et al., 2013, ‘Serosurvey of dogs for human, livestock, and wildlife pathogens, Uganda’, Emerging Infectious Diseases 19, 680–682. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1904.121143

Minnaar, W.N. & Krecek, R.C., 2001, ‘Helminths in dogs belonging to people in a resource-limited urban community in Gauteng, South Africa’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 111–117.

Minnaar, W.N., Krecek, R.C. & Fourie, L.J., 2002, ‘Helminths in dogs from a peri-urban resource-limited community in Free State Province, South Africa’, Veterinary Parasitology 107, 343–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00155-3

Minnaar, W.N., Krecek, R.C. & Rajput, J.I., 1999, ‘Helminth parasites of dogs from two resource-limited communities in South Africa’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 70, 92–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v70i2.761

Noden, B.H. & Soni, M., 2015, ’Vector-borne diseases of small companion animals in Namibia: Literature review, knowledge gaps and opportunity for a One Health approach’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 86, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v86i1.1307

Overgaauw, P.A.M. & van Knapen, F., 2013, ‘Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp’, Veterinary Parasitology 193, 398–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.035

Proboste, T., Kalema-Zikusoka, G., Altet, L., Solano-Gallego, L., Fernández de Mera, I.G., Chirife, A.D. et al., 2015, ‘Infection and exposure to vector-borne pathogens in rural dogs and their ticks, Uganda’, Parasites & Vectors 8, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0919-x

Reaser, J.K., Clark, E.E. & Meyers, N.M., 2008, ‘All creatures great and minute: A public policy primer for companion animal zoonoses’, Zoonoses and Public Health 55, 385–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01123.x

Rodriguez-Vivas, R.I., Albornoz, R.E.F. & Bolio, G.M.E., 2005, ‘Ehrlichia canis in dogs in Yucatan, Mexico: Seroprevalence, prevalence of infection and associated factors’, Veterinary Parasitology 127, 75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.08.022

Rubinsky-Elefant, G., Hirata, C.E., Yamamoto, J.H. & Ferreira, M.U., 2010, ‘Human toxocariasis: Diagnosis, worldwide seroprevalences and clinical expression of the systemic and ocular forms’, Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 104, 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/136485910X12607012373957

Schurer, J.M., Ndao, M., Skinner, S., Irvine, J., Elmore, S.A., Epp, T. et al., 2013, ‘Parasitic zoonoses: One health surveillance in Northern Saskatchewan’, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002141

Slater, M.R., 2001, ‘The role of veterinary epidemiology in the study of free-roaming dogs and cats’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 48, 273–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00201-4

Sowemimo, O. & Asaolu, S.O., 2008, ‘Epidemiology of intestinal helminth parasites of dogs in Ibadan, Nigeria’, Journal of Helminthology 82, 89–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X07875924

Swai, E.S., Kaaya, E.J., Mshanga, D.A. & Mbise, E.W., 2010, ‘A survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of non-descript dogs in and around Arusha municipality, Tanzania’, International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advance 3, 63–67.

Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L. & Wall, R.L., 2007, Veterinary parasitology, 3rd edn., Wiley Blackwell, London.

Traub, R.J., Pednekar, R.P., Cuttell, L., Porter, R.B., Abd Megat Rani, P.A. & Gatne, M.L., 2014, ‘The prevalence and distribution of gastrointestinal parasites of stray and refuge dogs in four locations in India’, Veterinary Parasitology 205, 233–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.037

Vezzani, D., Carbajo, A.E., Fontanarrosa, M.F., Scodellaro, C.F., Basabe, J., Cangiano, G. et al., 2011, ‘Epidemiology of canine heartworm in its southern distribution limit in South America: Risk factors, inter-annual trend and spatial patterns’, Veterinary Parasitology 176, 240–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.046

Wells, K., Beaucournu, J.C., Durden, L.A., Petney, T.N., Lakim, M.B. & O’Hara, R.B., 2012, ‘Ectoparasite infestation patterns of domestic dogs in suburban and rural areas in Borneo’, Parasitology Research 111, 909–917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-2917-7

WHO, 2012, World Health Organization, Malawi, viewed 07 February 2016, from http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/resources/MALAWI.pdf

Woodroffe, R., Prager, K.C., Munson, L., Conrad, P.A., Dubovi, E.J. & Mazet, J.A.K., 2012, ‘Contact with domestic dogs increases pathogen exposure in endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus)’, PLoS One 7, e30099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030099

Yabsley, M.J., McKibben, J., Macpherson, C.N., Cattan, P.F., Cherry, N.A., Hegarty, B.C. et al., 2008, ‘Prevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma platys, Babesia canis vogeli, Hepatozoon canis, Bartonella vinsonii berkhoffii, and Rickettsia spp. in dogs from Grenada’, Veterinary Parasitology 151, 279–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.11.008


Crossref Citations

1. The Complexity of Zoonotic Filariasis Episystem and Its Consequences: A Multidisciplinary View
Fernando Simón, Javier González-Miguel, Alicia Diosdado, Paula Josefina Gómez, Rodrigo Morchón, Vladimir Kartashev
BioMed Research International  vol: 2017  first page: 1  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1155/2017/6436130