Eco-epidemiological and pathological features of wildlife mortality events related to cyanobacterial biointoxication in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

Authors

  • Roy Bengis Private Wildlife Practice
  • Danny Govender South African National Parks
  • Emily Lane National Zoological Gardens of South Africa
  • Jan Myburgh University of Pretoria
  • Paul Oberholster CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment
  • Peter Buss South African National Parks
  • Leon Prozesky University of Pretoria
  • Dewald Keet Private Wildlife Practice

Abstract

Over the past decade, several clustered, multispecies, wildlife mortality events occurred in the vicinity of two man-made earthen dams in the southern and south central regions of the Kruger National Park, South Africa. On field investigation, heavy cyanobacterial blooms were visible in these impoundments and analysis of water samples showed the dominance of Microcystis spp. (probably Microcystis aeruginosa). Macroscopic lesions seen at necropsy and histopathological lesions were compatible with a diagnosis of cyanobacterial intoxication. Laboratory toxicity tests and assays also confirmed the presence of significant levels of
microcystins in water from the two dams. These outbreaks occurred during the dry autumn and early winter seasons when water levels in these dams were dropping, and a common feature was that all the affected dams were supporting a large number of hippopotamuses (Hippopotamus amphibius). It is hypothesised that hippopotamus’ urine and faeces, together with agitation of the sediments, significantly contributed to internal loading of phosphates and nitrogen – leading to eutrophication of the water in these impoundments and subsequent cyanobacterial blooms. A major cause for concern was that a number of white rhinoceros
(Ceratotherium simum) were amongst the victims of these bio-intoxication events. This publication discusses the eco-epidemiology and pathology of these clustered mortalities, as well as the management options considered and eventually used to address the problem.

Author Biographies

  • Roy Bengis, Private Wildlife Practice

    Private Wildlife Practice, Port Alfred, South Africa

  • Danny Govender, South African National Parks

    Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa and Department of Paraclinical
    Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa

  • Emily Lane, National Zoological Gardens of South Africa

    Department of Research and Scientific Services, National Zoological Gardens of South Africa, South Africa

  • Jan Myburgh, University of Pretoria

    Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa

  • Paul Oberholster, CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment

    CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, Stellenbosch, South Africa

  • Peter Buss, South African National Parks

    Veterinary Wildlife Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa

  • Leon Prozesky, University of Pretoria

    Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa

  • Dewald Keet, Private Wildlife Practice

    Private Wildlife Practice, Phalaborwa, South Africa

Downloads

Published

2021-12-09

Issue

Section

Original Research